There are no active references in this article.
A tree of rounded form, 30 to 50 ft high in this country, but 60 to 80 ft high on the continent; winter buds slightly resinous. Leaves composed of five or seven leaflets, which are very like those of the common horse-chestnut, but smaller, darker green, and usually with a very short stalk. Flowers deep red on a panicle 6 to 8 in. high, 4 in. diameter; stamens slightly protruding. Fruit globose, slightly prickly, 11⁄2 in. diameter.
Of the origin of the tree nothing certain is known. There is little doubt, however, that it is a hybrid between the common horse-chestnut and A. pavia, having the habit and foliage of the former, and the colour of the flowers and glandular-edged petals of the latter. It probably originated as a chance hybrid made by insects quite early in the nineteenth century, and had attained a considerable size before its distinctness was noticed. It was first distributed around 1820; the parent tree is thought to have grown in Germany and its original offspring were probably the products of budding or grafting.
The hybrid has proved to be of great scientific interest. About 1896 some half a dozen plants were raised from seed at Kew, which proved to be no different from ordinary A. × carnea, or from each other, except in the depth of colour of the flower. As was remarked in previous editions of this work, it is unusual for the progeny of a hybrid to resemble the parent so closely, but the reason is now understood and the original observations made at Kew have been confirmed by further experiment on a larger scale. The original A. × carnea must have been a diploid, with forty chromosomes, as in the parents. It was probably rather sterile, as is usually the case with hybrids between such distantly related species as A. hippocastanum and A. pavia, and would not have bred true even if fertile seed had been produced. But at some stage in the history of the clone (perhaps on the parent tree itself), spontaneous doubling of the chromosomes must have taken place, thus giving to each chromosome a matching partner and permitting the normal pairing that takes place in the flowering plants as a preliminary to reproduction. This phenomenon, of which many instances have been recorded, not only confers fertility on a previously sterile or partly sterile hybrid, but permits it to breed more or less true. Another well-known example is Primula × kewensis.
If the doubling of the chromosomes took place on the original parent tree – a possibility suggested above – then only part of it would have been tetraploid (i.e. with eighty chromosomes instead of the normal forty), and the scions would have given rise to diploid or tetraploid plants according to the branch from which they were taken. This might explain reports from the mid-nineteenth century that A. × carnea did not breed true, whereas the tree at Kew did so.
The trunk of this tree frequently becomes diseased when over 1 ft in diameter, and covered with ugly eruptions which ultimately decay and disintegrate into a sort of powder. According to Massee, there is no parasitic organism, animal or fungoid, present to cause this disease, which appears to be solely due to the abnormal development and ultimate rupture and death of the cells.
cv. ‘Plantierensis’. – See A. × plantierensis on page 262. This clone is really best placed under A. × carnea, since this name covers all hybrid combinations of the two parents.